Multiple Recordings and Copying Recordings in VoiceModel

I had a couple of enhancement requests in the VoiceModel Project around making user recordings.  The first request was to allow the directory that holds the recordings to be specified as a file structure or file share. And the second request was to allow multiple recordings in a single session.  I finally got some time to look at implementing these enhancements and was pleasantly surprised that the features were already in place because of the flexibility in the VoiceModel architecture and state machine. Well, for the most part. I will explain one little change I had to make to VoiceModel to get this to work.

To test this out I updated the RecordingExample project in the VMWithExamples solution. You can get the source code here. Basically my solution was to add an On-Exit-Action to the recording state that copies the recorded file to another location.  This satisfies the request to be able to put recording in another location, including a file share.   Here is what the On-Exit-Action looks like.

flow.AddState(ViewStateBuilder.Build("getRecording", "playback",
    new Record("getRecording", "Please record your information after the beep.  Press the pound key when you are finished."))
    .AddOnExitAction(delegate(CallFlow cf, State state, Event e)
    {
        VoiceModel.Logger.ILoggerService logger = VoiceModel.Logger.LoggerFactory.GetInstance();
        try
        {
            //Copy last recording to another location
            string recordingPhysicalPath = Server.MapPath(RecordingPath);
            string recordingFileName = recordingPhysicalPath + "//" + cf.SessionId + ".wav";
            logger.Debug("Copying recording " + recordingFileName);
            System.IO.File.Copy(recordingFileName, "c://tmp//" + cf.SessionId + "_first.wav");
        }
        catch (Exception ex)
        {
            logger.Error("Error copying recording: " + ex.Message);
        }
    }), true);

That is all that is required to copy your recording to any location and even rename them. You will notice that I kept the session ID in the name to make sure the file name was unique and would not be copied over by another call into the system. You can use any scheme you would like to manage these file. For example, maybe you collected a unique caller identifier earlier in the voice application that you could use to organize recordings by caller.

It turns out this helps satisfy the second requirement for multiple recordings. Since we can copy the recording to another location for safe keeping we can just add another Record object in the application and it will replace the original recording. Then you just copy it again to another location using a different file name. I tested this out in the example and it works fine. The first recording I named [SessionId]_first.wav and the second recording I named [SessionId]_second.wav.

But I did find a problem on playback of the recordings.  The URI for audio recording for the first and second recordings are the same since the file name is solely base on the session ID.  I used Voxeo Cloud VoiceXML Platform to test this and it does an excellent job of caching audio files which I did not want in this case.  This caused the application to voice back the first recording when the caller should have been listening to the second recording.  I solved this by changing VoiceModel to specify not the use cache in the HTML header when retrieving audio recordings. You can get the latest release of  VoiceModel with this fix on NuGet.  This would have also been an issue if you  are setting up something like a voice mail system with VoiceModel, where you give the caller a chance to re-record what they have already recorded.  Playback would always just used the first recording.

This example also demonstrates how easy it is to add logging to your VoiceModel applications. This proved invaluable when troubleshooting initial issues when trying to copy recordings.  The only other thing you need to do to add this logging is make sure you have a log4net config file in the root of your application directory.

I love it when enhancement requests can be handled with very little change to the code.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Using Claims in ASP.NET Identity

Claims can simplify and increase the performance of authentication and authorization processes. I wrote about how you can use the roles stored as claims to eliminate back-end queries every time authorization takes place .  ASP.NET Identity has good support for claims-based identity and it creates several claims for you automatically when you create a new identity.  Here is how we create the identity for a new user during the log-in process UserManager<applicationuser> userManager = new UserManager<applicationuser>(new UserStore<applicationuser>(new SecurityContext())); ClaimsIdentity identity = userManager.CreateIdentity(user, DefaultAuthenticationTypes.ApplicationCookie); If you inspect the Claims property of ClaimsIdentity after calling CreateIdentity you will see that there are there are three or more claims. There is a claim for the user ID, user name, identity provider and one for each role assigned. So what if you want to add some more claims? Here...
Keep reading

Customizing Claims for Authorization in ASP.NET Core 2.0

Image
There have been some major changes to ASP.NET Identity with the release of Core 2.0, which you can read about here .  One of the major changes is that it does not rely on using middleware anymore to customize it.  Instead dependency injection is used by configuring via services in the ConfigureServices method of StartUp.cs .   There is not much documentation or examples on how to do this so I am going to explore how to customize ASP.NET Identity and publish some examples in this blog.  First I wanted to look at how you would add custom claims to the identity and then use those claims for authorization. To begin create a new ASP.NET Core Web Application  project in Visual Studio 2017.  Be sure to select . NET Core and ASP.NET Core 2.0 in the two drop downs at the top.  Select the template for Web Application (Model-View-Controller) and Change the Authentication to Individual User Accounts .  When the project is created you are ready to add so...
Keep reading

Seeding & Customizing ASP.NET MVC SimpleMembership

Image
In ASP.NET MVC 4 Microsoft introduced a new membership provider that is referred to as SimpleMembership.  SimpleMembership makes it easier to customize user profiles and incorporates  OAuth support.  I have seen a lot of questions on StackOverflow on how to customize SimpleMembership and seed it with data and in this post I will discuss some methods for achieving both . SimpleMembership uses Entity Framework (EF) 5 and the code-first model. To initialize the database that contains the users and roles a filter is used called  InitializeSimpleMembershipAttribute.   This attribute is decorated on the AccountController as shown here: [Authorize] [InitializeSimpleMembership] public class AccountController : Controller { ... } This is setup this way so that the initialization code is only called when accessing the actions on the AccountController .  If you look at the code for  InitializeSimpleMembershipAttribute you will see a lot of cod...
Keep reading